Skip to main content

About your Search

20121001
20121009
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)
, and spend his energy and passion for two years fighting for obama care. >> the president made his points in a slower, more laid back, often looking down, sometimes appearing disengaged. it's not that he didn't try to rip apart romney's economic plan. >> that kind of top-down economics where folks at the top are doing well, so the average person making $3 million is getting a $250,000 tax break while middle class families are burdened further. >> romney was determined to go toe to toe. >> well, but virtually everything he said about my tax plan is inaccurate. if the tax plan he described were a tax plan i was asked to support, i would say absolutely not. >> the president did get digs in. >> for 18 months he has been running on this tax plan, and now five weeks before the election he is saying that his big bold idea is never mind. >> but he also showed flashes of the kind of testiness sources in both camps feared from their candidates, except obama's was directed at the moderator, not romney. >> the last point i would make before -- >> ten minutes is up, sir. >> i think -- i had five secon
of virginia as well because, number one on my list is to take full advantage of all our energy resources, our oil, our coal, our gas, our nuclear, our renewables. and i know you care a lot more about coal than the other ones i just mentioned, so let me just remind you that when the president was running for office, he said that if you built a new coal fire plant, well, you would go bankrupt, and the head of the e.p.a. has also said that the regulations on burning coal are now so stringent it's virtually impossible to build a new coal fire plant. well, i don't believe in putting our coal under the ground fore. i believe we should take advantage of it, put american workers back to work, and use a resource that's abundant and cheap and can be burned in a clean way. by the way, i also believe in oil and gas. i believe we should develop our resources. i believe within eight years america -- north america, rather, should be energy-independent, and that requires all those sources of energy. that will keep the price at the pump moderated. it will keep the price of electricity moderated. it will also
an opportunity to ask questions of the candidate in myrtle beach. do you remember the energy in that room. i mean you knew when they went after each other the battle was on. it was game on time. you had cheers. you had jeers. all that. and people remember those moments. what do you think -- what do you think the president -- what do you think he learned out of that experience? >> you know, i thought about that for a while today, suzanne. i think the president clearly perfected his style. it was pretty clear to me that he started seeing even then that any flashes of anger on his part were more likely than not to go over poorly. so in that debate that you and in moderated together with wolf, we saw efforts by hillary clinton who was also running for president at the time to get under the president's skin, to get under mr. obama's skin again and again and again. it looked like to some degree there in south carolina both hillary clinton and bill clinton were sort of -- were sort of going after him at the same time, trying to fluster him when he got to this debate. he never went there. and i think tha
is not will the sanctions be able to somehow physically stop the iranians from pursuing the nuclear energy program or weapons program, but the question is will it bring them to the negotiating table because they feel the pain is so crippling, because they feel their economy is in a death spiral. that's where the pressure is going to act. the pressure isn't going to be that somebody shot down their ability to make nuclear -- to produce nuclear energy. >> all right. fareed zakaria, thank you very much for your analysis. as always. want to bring in our military expert as well to talk about some of the differences between these two leaders, general spider marks. one of the things we heard is that these are two individuals who believe that mitt romney makes the case that we are more dangerous. that we are not safer off than four years ago. is that consistent? is that right? >> well, there is some evidence that there is -- there are a number of proobz, obviously, with the case in syria and the enrichment of uranium that we've clearly been able to see in iran, but also look at syria's -- the support that
of energies.ve the world needs a broader that's why we're supplying natural gas to generate cleaner electricity... that has around 50% fewer co2 emissions than coal. and it's also why, with our partner in brazil, shell is producing ethanol - a biofuel made from renewable sugarcane. >>a minute, mom! let's broaden the world's energy mix. let's go. ♪ (train horn) vo: wherever our trains go, the economy comes to life. norfolk southern. one line, infinite possibilities. >>> trying to gain some traction in tonight's first big debate? well, one area where mitt romney is facing a huge hurdle in overcoming the lead that president obama has is with latino voters. take a look at this. cnn-orc poll of latino's voters choice for president whopping 70% for president obama compared to 26% for mrr. romney doing worse than john mccain did in 2008. mccain got 31% of the latino vote. worse than bush. bush got back in 2004, 44% of latino votes. barbara is joining us live from denver. one of romney's senior advisors and co-chair of his effort in virginia. toercht's debate, first of all, it's on domest
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)